-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 741
Qualcomm AI Engine Direct - support SW6100 #16003
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Qualcomm AI Engine Direct - support SW6100 #16003
Conversation
Summary - Support SOC SW6100 Test plan - Use unit test with -m SW6100
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/16003
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 7e123d2 with merge base 5daa6e3 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
@pytorchbot label "release notes: qualcomm" |
|
@cccclai @haowhsu-quic |
| QcomChipset.SXR2330P: SocInfo(QcomChipset.SXR2330P, HtpInfo(HtpArch.V79, 8)), | ||
| QcomChipset.QCS9100: SocInfo(QcomChipset.QCS9100, HtpInfo(HtpArch.V73, 8)), | ||
| QcomChipset.SAR2230P: SocInfo(QcomChipset.SAR2230P, HtpInfo(HtpArch.V81, 4)), | ||
| QcomChipset.SW6100: SocInfo(QcomChipset.SW6100, HtpInfo(HtpArch.V81, 4)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@billmguo mentioned in the email saying it should be v79 HTP + 2MB vtcm, can we double check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The data was collected in internal QNN codebase. Since we don't have the corresponding device, could you try this configuration on your side?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The data was collected in internal QNN codebase. Since we don't have the corresponding device, could you try this configuration on your side?
Referring to QC doc 80-74841-45 Rev. AA Qualcomm® Hexagon Tensor Processor Overview for SW6100, it states v79 HTP, but doesn't mention VTCM size. Is the doc inaccurate or outdated?
| QcomChipset.SXR2330P: SocInfo(QcomChipset.SXR2330P, HtpInfo(HtpArch.V79, 8)), | ||
| QcomChipset.QCS9100: SocInfo(QcomChipset.QCS9100, HtpInfo(HtpArch.V73, 8)), | ||
| QcomChipset.SAR2230P: SocInfo(QcomChipset.SAR2230P, HtpInfo(HtpArch.V81, 4)), | ||
| QcomChipset.SW6100: SocInfo(QcomChipset.SW6100, HtpInfo(HtpArch.V81, 4)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SW6100 seems should be v79, 2MB VTCM not v81 4MB VTCM
| QCS9100 = 77 # v73 | ||
| SAR2230P = 95 # v81 | ||
| SA8255 = 52 # v73 | ||
| SW6100 = 96 # v81 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any formal doc can get the socid SW6100
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we have tried this it worked in our HW thanks approve the diff
|
Can you rebase to trigger the CI? |
Summary
Test plan